East Coast Sports Live

As the 2025 collegiate gymnastics season approaches, excitement builds across conferences with the release of preseason coaches' polls and gymnasts-to-watch lists. Programs such as Michigan State, California, and UCLA are set to make their mark, with each team showcasing star talent and strong ambitions for the upcoming season. The season promises thrilling rivalries, groundbreaking performances, and a spotlight on rising stars. ACC Preseason Highlights The Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) anticipates a highly competitive season, particularly with the addition of California and Stanford to its gymnastics ranks. California, the 2024 NCAA runner-up, earned the top spot in the preseason coaches' poll, edging out Stanford and reigning ACC champion NC State. This marks a significant shift for the ACC, as the league looks to build its reputation as a gymnastics powerhouse. California boasts a wealth of talent, including eMjae Frazier and Mya Lauzon, both named to the ACC Preseason Watch List. Frazier’s dynamic routines and Lauzon’s consistency across all apparatus make them a formidable duo. Newcomer Ondine Achampong is expected to make an immediate impact in her freshman campaign, bringing international experience and refined skills to the team. Stanford, ranked No. 2 in the ACC poll, also features standout gymnasts Anna Roberts and Brenna Neault, whose elegance and difficulty level set them apart. Meanwhile, NC State continues to rely on experienced competitors like Chloe Negrete and Katie Harper, who bring leadership and competitive edge to the team. Pitt, North Carolina, and Clemson round out the ACC standings, each showcasing promising recruits like Stanford's Ui Soma and Pitt’s Meika Lee. Big Ten Preseason Powerhouses Michigan State headlines the Big Ten preseason poll, claiming the No. 1 spot for the first time in program history. After securing their second consecutive Big Ten Championship in 2024, the Spartans look to build on their momentum with senior Skyla Schulte and junior Nikki Smith leading the way. Schulte’s versatility and Smith’s record-breaking all-around performances position Michigan State as a formidable contender for national success. Schulte enters her senior season as a two-time All-American and the reigning Big Ten all-around champion. Known for her grace and consistency, she is a key figure in Michigan State’s lineup. Nikki Smith, who holds the school record in the all-around, adds scoring power and reliability on all apparatus. Their leadership and high-scoring potential make the Spartans a favorite not just in the Big Ten but also nationally. UCLA, a newcomer to the Big Ten, ranks second in the poll and brings star power with Olympic medalists Jordan Chiles and Emma Malabuyo. Chiles, known for her explosive vaults and precision on beam, promises to elevate the Bruins’ performances. Malabuyo’s artistry and fluidity complement the team’s dynamic roster. Michigan, Ohio State, and Minnesota round out the top five, highlighting the depth and talent within the conference. Standout Gymnasts to Watch The preseason watch lists provide a glimpse into the athletes expected to make a significant impact this season. Skyla Schulte’s three-time First Team All-Big Ten accolades and career-high scores across all four apparatus make her a standout. Jordan Chiles, an Olympic silver medalist, is celebrated for her power, consistency, and ability to deliver under pressure. eMjae Frazier’s leadership at California is critical to their continued success, as her performances across all events demonstrate versatility and competitive grit. Mya Hooten of Minnesota, famous for her viral floor routines combining high-level tumbling and captivating choreography, remains a fan favorite. Freshmen such as Sophia Diaz from Michigan and Delaney Adrian from Rutgers are poised to make immediate impacts, signaling a new wave of talent ready to shine. The level of talent this season is unmatched, with gymnasts blending artistry and athleticism to push the boundaries of the sport. Fans can expect upgraded routines, innovative choreography, and impressive difficulty levels as these athletes strive for perfection. Key Competitions to Watch The season officially kicks off on January 4, with Michigan State hosting Western Michigan and other teams beginning their journeys at quad meets and invitationals. Early-season events provide a glimpse of team depth and readiness, while mid-season showcases like the Metroplex Challenge will test programs against top-tier competition. The ACC Gymnastics Championships, scheduled for March 22 in Greensboro, North Carolina, promises intense competition as California, Stanford, and NC State vie for the title. Similarly, the Big Ten Championships on March 23 will feature powerhouses like Michigan State and UCLA battling for supremacy in one of the nation’s deepest conferences. The road to the NCAA Championships, set for April 18-20 in Fort Worth, Texas, will be filled with compelling storylines, as programs aim to peak at the right time and secure spots in the prestigious meet. A Season of High Expectations With powerhouse programs and elite athletes primed for action, the 2025 gymnastics season promises to deliver exceptional performances and thrilling competition. This year’s depth of talent highlights the sport’s growing popularity and evolution. Programs like Michigan State and California are poised to challenge perennial contenders like Florida, Oklahoma, and Utah for national supremacy. As fans prepare for an unforgettable season, the storylines surrounding top-ranked programs and emerging talents will captivate audiences across the country. From stunning individual routines to dramatic team finishes, the 2025 season is shaping up to be one for the history books.

In a significant move that marks the continued transformation of college athletics, the NCAA Division I Council voted on October 9, 2024, to eliminate the National Letter of Intent (NLI) program. This change represents a historic shift in how high school student-athletes will commit to their colleges and comes at a time when the NCAA is navigating unprecedented changes in its approach to student-athlete compensation, recruitment, and eligibility rules. The NLI program, which was introduced in 1964, has long served as the formal binding agreement between a student-athlete and a college. It prevented other schools from recruiting athletes once they signed with a program and ensured that the school would provide athletic financial aid for at least one academic year. However, starting with the 2025 recruiting class, the NLI will be replaced by financial aid and scholarship agreements that aim to streamline the process while maintaining many of the same core functions of the old system. The End of the National Letter of Intent For decades, the NLI program provided structure and security to both athletes and schools. When a recruit signed an NLI, they were committing to attend that school for one academic year, and in return, the school was legally obligated to provide financial aid. This created a binding relationship that was supposed to prevent last-minute changes or poaching by rival schools. But over the years, the NLI system faced criticism for being overly rigid and not keeping up with the evolving landscape of college sports, particularly in the age of the transfer portal and NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals. With the NCAA now embracing a new era of athlete compensation, revenue-sharing, and increased mobility through the transfer portal, the NLI’s usefulness has come into question. Many players, particularly high-profile recruits, were bypassing the NLI entirely, opting instead to sign athletic aid agreements, which essentially guaranteed them the same financial security without the same restrictions on transferring schools. The elimination of the NLI program is closely tied to the upcoming revenue-sharing model set to begin in the 2025-2026 academic year. This new system, introduced following the landmark House v. NCAA lawsuit settlement, will allow schools to share up to $20 million in revenue with student-athletes annually. As part of this shift, the NLI was seen as an outdated mechanism that no longer fit with the modern structure of college athletics, where athletes are increasingly treated more like professional players than amateurs. Replacing the NLI with Financial Aid Agreements Although the NLI is being scrapped, athletes will still sign documents that formalize their commitment to a program. Financial aid and scholarship agreements will replace the NLI, with the goal of simplifying the process and providing greater flexibility for both players and schools. Under the new system, schools will be required to offer written athletic financial aid agreements that guarantee aid for at least one academic year. Once a player signs this agreement, other schools will be prohibited from contacting them about recruitment. The key difference is that the financial aid agreements do not come with the same strict penalties for transferring that the NLI imposed. In the past, athletes who wanted to break their NLI agreements could face penalties, such as being forced to sit out a semester. However, recent changes to the NLI already allowed athletes to request releases under certain circumstances, such as coaching changes. Now, with the NLI eliminated entirely, the NCAA hopes to provide athletes with more autonomy over their decisions, while still maintaining some structure in the recruiting process. What the Change Means for Recruiting For college coaches and recruiters, the elimination of the NLI raises important questions about the future of college football’s signing periods and recruitment calendars. One major concern is the possibility of more last-minute decisions by recruits, as there is no longer a binding NLI that locks them into their decisions. This could lead to more chaos during the signing periods, with high-profile athletes potentially waiting until the last possible moment to sign their financial aid agreements. This opens up the possibility that some of these high-profile recruitments could spill into January as players and their families navigate the negotiations that often happen in the final hours before a decision is made. This could create more uncertainty for college programs, especially with the expanded College Football Playoff making the postseason longer and more complex. Programs may have to adjust their recruitment strategies to account for the extended decision-making timelines that could arise under the new system. Impact of the NLI’s Elimination on Athletes For student-athletes, the removal of the NLI presents both opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, the new system gives players more control over their recruitment process, with fewer restrictions on their ability to change schools if circumstances change. This could be particularly beneficial for athletes who face coaching changes, program instability, or other factors that make their initial commitments less desirable. On the other hand, the lack of a binding NLI could create more pressure for recruits, especially those who are not considered top-tier prospects. Without the protection of the NLI, lower-profile recruits might face increased competition for scholarships and offers as schools focus more attention on securing elite players. Additionally, recruits may feel more pressure to negotiate NIL deals alongside their financial aid agreements, adding another layer of complexity to the recruiting process. As the NCAA continues to evolve its policies in response to the rapidly changing landscape of college sports, it remains to be seen how the elimination of the NLI will play out over the long term. For now, the focus will shift to how the new financial aid agreements are implemented and whether they provide the same level of security and stability for both athletes and programs. Looking Ahead: Revenue Sharing and the Future of College Sports The elimination of the NLI is just one of many changes happening within the NCAA as it moves toward a revenue-sharing model that will fundamentally alter the relationship between student-athletes and their schools. Beginning in the 2025-26 academic year, schools will be able to share a portion of their revenue with athletes, marking a seismic shift in how college sports are structured. This change has the potential to dramatically alter recruitment, player development, and even the competitive balance within college sports, as schools with larger revenue streams may be able to offer more lucrative financial packages to top athletes.  As the NLI era comes to an end, the NCAA faces a critical moment in its history. The organization must find ways to balance the demands of modern college sports with the need to protect the integrity of amateur athletics, all while ensuring that student-athletes are treated fairly and given the opportunities they deserve. The future of college sports is undoubtedly headed in a new direction, and the elimination of the National Letter of Intent is just the beginning.

The NCAA’s Division I Council has voted to shorten the transfer portal windows for football and basketball, reducing the time frame for players to enter the portal from 45 to 30 days. This change, announced in early October 2024, aims to bring more stability to team rosters as the transfer portal continues to influence the landscape of college sports. While the move seeks to address concerns about player movement, it highlights ongoing issues, particularly with players sitting out the season to preserve eligibility by exploiting the redshirt rule. Exploiting the Redshirt Rule Players across the country are increasingly using the NCAA’s redshirt rule, which allows them to preserve a year of eligibility if they play in no more than four games in a season. This rule, originally intended to protect players from losing eligibility due to injuries or developmental needs, has now become a loophole. Players dissatisfied with their playing time, disappointed by NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals, or simply unhappy with their program are opting out of the season, walking away from their teams mid-year while preserving their eligibility. In recent years, this trend has gained momentum, with high-profile athletes choosing to sit out after four games to enter the transfer portal. The redshirt rule has provided them with a way to protect their eligibility while exploring new opportunities through the transfer system. This loophole has left coaches and programs scrambling, with some questioning the long-term impact on team cohesion and the development of college athletes. NIL Deals and Player Movement One of the driving forces behind this surge in player transfers is the NIL landscape. College athletes are now able to monetize their name, image, and likeness, but many players have found that NIL deals are not always as lucrative as promised. Disappointed by unfulfilled agreements or unsatisfactory financial arrangements, some players are choosing to sit out the season and transfer in search of better opportunities elsewhere. While NIL deals offer athletes financial freedom, they have also contributed to instability within teams. With players focused on short-term financial gains, many are making decisions based on the promise of better deals rather than long-term development or team loyalty. Impact on Programs and Teammates For coaches and teammates, the decision by players to leave mid-season can feel like a betrayal. Coaches invest significant time and resources in developing their players, only to see them leave at a critical point in the season. Programs are left trying to fill roster gaps, often with no immediate replacement available. This not only affects team chemistry but also creates uncertainty for the rest of the roster, with players unsure of what the future holds for their team. Additionally, players who leave their team mid-season often do so under the guidance of agents or street agents, who may not always have their best interests at heart. These agents push players to leave in search of better deals or more playing time without fully considering the long-term consequences of walking away from their current program. As a result, players are often left in limbo, searching for new opportunities that may not materialize as promised. Shortening Transfer Windows The NCAA’s recent decision to shorten the transfer windows in an attempt to bring more stability to college sports comes in response to concerns raised by coaches and administrators. Under the new rules, players in football and basketball will have a 30-day window to enter the transfer portal, down from the previous 45-day window. The winter transfer window for football will now be from December 9 through December 28, while the spring window will last from April 16 to April 25. This move aims to reduce the amount of time players spend considering their transfer options and provide more clarity for teams and coaching staffs as they prepare for the next season. However, despite these changes, the redshirt rule remains in place, allowing players to opt out mid-season if they have played in fewer than four games. Long-Term Consequences for Players While the redshirt rule may offer immediate benefits for players looking to transfer, there are potential long-term consequences that could affect their careers. College coaches are becoming increasingly wary of taking on players who have left their previous teams mid-season, fearing that they may repeat the behavior if things don’t go their way in the future. This raises concerns about a player’s loyalty and ability to handle adversity. NFL scouts are also likely to take note of these trends. A player who leaves a program due to dissatisfaction with playing time or NIL deals may be viewed as a risk when it comes to contract negotiations or tough competition at the professional level. NFL teams value players who can persevere through challenges, and walking away from a college team could raise red flags for scouts evaluating a player’s character. Moreover, the decision to transfer mid-season can disrupt a player’s academic progress, making it more difficult to stay on track for graduation. For athletes who don’t make it to the NFL, the ability to graduate and pursue a career outside of football is crucial, and mid-season transfers can jeopardize that outcome. The Future of College Sports As the NCAA continues to adapt to the evolving landscape of college sports, it is clear that more needs to be done to regulate player movement and ensure that athletes are making decisions that benefit their long-term careers. While the shortening of the transfer window is a step in the right direction, additional regulations may be necessary to prevent players from exploiting the redshirt rule and walking out on their teams mid-season.  With more players taking advantage of the redshirt rule to preserve eligibility and explore transfer opportunities, the future of college sports could be shaped by a growing culture of player movement, leaving coaches and programs facing new challenges in maintaining team stability and developing long-term success.

In the fast-evolving landscape of college football, an increasing number of players are opting out of the season mid-way, taking advantage of the NCAA’s redshirt rule, which allows them to preserve a year of eligibility if they have not played more than four games. This rule, originally intended to protect players from losing eligibility due to injuries or development needs, has become a loophole for players facing reduced playing time, unfulfilled NIL deals, or dissatisfaction within their programs. NCAA’s Redshirt Rule: A Loophole in Player Movement The NCAA’s redshirt rule was introduced in 2018, allowing players to participate in up to four games while still retaining the ability to redshirt, preserving that year of eligibility. Initially designed to help players dealing with injuries or in need of development, this rule is now being used by players looking for better opportunities through the transfer portal. For example, UCF recently saw five players, including wide receiver Xavier Townsend, opt to redshirt and transfer after playing just four games. Defensive end Kaven Call, right tackle Wes Dorsey, and safeties Bryon Threats and William Wells also followed suit, leaving the team mid-season. These players, like many others across the country, will now be eligible to join new teams for bowl practices and transfer elsewhere by next season. This rule, while beneficial for some, has resulted in players walking out on their teammates and programs during critical points of the season, leaving gaps that can be hard to fill. The players often make these decisions based on advice from agents or street agents, who promise greener pastures but may not always have the player’s long-term interests in mind. The Influence of NIL Deals Gone Wrong The rise of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals has also contributed to the trend of players redshirting and transferring. Players are lured by the promise of lucrative NIL deals, but when those promises aren’t fulfilled, they feel justified in leaving their current program. One highly publicized example involves former UNLV quarterback Matthew Sluka, who left the program after three games, citing a failed NIL deal. Sluka was reportedly promised $100,000 by UNLV’s NIL collective, but after receiving only $3,000, he decided to sit out the rest of the season, preserve his eligibility, and reenter the transfer portal. This case highlights how NIL agreements, while promising financial freedom for athletes, can also lead to instability within college football programs. Walking Out on Teammates and Programs For many college football coaches and teammates, watching players leave mid-season can feel like a betrayal. Players who opt out and transfer mid-season often leave holes in the roster that are difficult to replace. This not only affects team chemistry but also disrupts game plans and season strategies. The UCF example is not unique. Programs across the country are dealing with similar issues. Players like Sluka and USC’s defensive lineman Bear Alexander have shown that even high-profile players are not immune to the trend of leaving when the situation isn’t ideal. Alexander, after playing only three games for USC, chose to redshirt and transfer due to dissatisfaction with his playing time. His decision, like many others, was influenced by external factors like NIL promises and playing opportunities. Are Players Getting Bad Advice? Many of these players are being advised by agents or street agents who push them to leave their current programs without fully considering the long-term consequences. These agents often prioritize short-term gains, encouraging players to transfer in search of better NIL deals or more playing time. However, this advice may not always be in the player’s best interest. Coaches have raised concerns that some players are not being encouraged to persevere and work through their struggles, but are instead being told to leave at the first sign of difficulty. This behavior raises red flags for future coaches and NFL scouts. A player who has walked away from one program may be seen as a risk for repeating the behavior when faced with challenges again. Long-Term Ramifications for Players While players may gain immediate benefits from preserving their eligibility and seeking better opportunities, there are long-term consequences to consider. College coaches are becoming more cautious about taking on players who have left their previous teams mid-season, fearing that these players might not stick around if things don’t go their way. This could limit the player’s opportunities to land with successful programs in the future. NFL teams are also likely to scrutinize players who walk out on their college teams. Scouts and coaches may question the player’s commitment and ability to handle adversity, which could affect their draft stock. If a player is willing to leave a program in college due to NIL disputes or playing time, NFL teams may fear that the player could do the same when facing contract disputes or tough competition at the professional level. Additionally, transferring mid-season can have a negative impact on a player’s academics. Switching schools mid-year can disrupt academic progress, putting players at risk of falling behind or failing to meet graduation requirements. For those who don’t make it to the NFL, failing to graduate could severely limit their post-football career options. The Need for Stricter Regulation As more college football players use the redshirt rule to leave programs mid-season, it becomes clear that the NCAA may need to consider stronger regulations. While the rule was created to benefit injured or developing players, it is now being exploited for reasons far removed from its original intent. Without proper oversight, this trend will likely continue, affecting not only the teams but the players’ long-term prospects as well. In response to these issues, the NCAA has taken some steps, such as shortening the transfer portal window. However, more comprehensive regulations may be needed to prevent players from making rash decisions that could negatively impact their careers.

UNLV starting quarterback Matthew Sluka has made headlines after announcing his departure from the team just three games into an undefeated season. The quarterback, who transferred from Holy Cross, decided to sit out the remainder of the season after promises surrounding his Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation allegedly went unfulfilled. This decision highlights a growing issue within college athletics, where disputes over NIL deals are becoming increasingly common and problematic. Sluka’s Exit from UNLV After leading UNLV to an impressive 3-0 start, Matthew Sluka’s decision to leave the team shocked fans and raised questions about the state of NIL agreements in college football. Sluka was reportedly promised a six-figure payday upon joining the Rebels, but according to his representatives, those promises were never met. Instead, Sluka only received a $3,000 relocation payment. This financial disagreement led to his decision to redshirt for the remainder of the season and enter the transfer portal in December. The situation became even more complicated when UNLV’s athletic department issued a statement denying any involvement in what they described as “pay-for-play” activities, which would violate NCAA rules and Nevada state law. The university also declined to meet the demands of Sluka’s representatives, who had been negotiating for the $100,000 payment they believed was promised. As a result, Sluka will now leave the team, marking a significant blow to UNLV’s ambitions for the season. The Bigger Picture: NIL’s Wild West This incident with Matthew Sluka at UNLV is just the latest example of the chaos surrounding NIL agreements in college sports. The world of NIL is often compared to the “wild wild west,” where student-athletes are left navigating unregulated and often inconsistent promises from schools and collectives. Another domino has fallen in this rapidly evolving space, as athletes continue to allege they have been burned by NIL deals that were not fulfilled. First, there was the highly publicized case of Jaden Rashada at the University of Florida. Rashada had committed to UF after reportedly being promised a $13.85 million NIL deal. When the deal fell through, Rashada sued Florida and head coach Billy Napier, alleging that he had been defrauded of millions. Now, this player at UNLV finds himself in a similar situation, over an apparent verbal contract that will likely not hold much weight in the court system. A Call for Reform This incident, like Rashada’s situation, will hopefully be a turning point for state lawmakers and athletic conferences to mandate that all NIL contracts must be filed with a designated party, such as a clearinghouse with the conference or the state. These changes would help provide transparency and accountability in the NIL space, protecting both the athletes and the schools involved. As the NIL landscape continues to evolve, it’s crucial that universities begin hiring law firms to educate their student-athletes, staff, and collectives about NIL legalities and rights, rather than relying on companies that focus solely on marketing and overlook important details like finances and state laws. The current system leaves athletes vulnerable to unfulfilled promises, and reforms are necessary to safeguard their interests and ensure that all parties involved understand their legal obligations. The Rebels will now move forward on their undefeated season without their starting quarterback, relying on other key players to step up in Sluka’s absence. While the controversy surrounding his departure may linger, the team’s focus will remain on continuing their successful season. What’s Next for UNLV? Despite the setback of losing their starting quarterback, UNLV will press forward with their undefeated season. The Rebels are currently 3-0 and have already pulled off upset wins against Big 12 programs like Houston and Kansas. Coach Barry Odom will now rely on senior quarterbacks Hajj-Malik Williams and Cameron Friel to lead the team as they enter Mountain West conference play. Williams, who transferred from Campbell University, is an experienced player who holds Campbell’s all-time passing record with over 8,000 career yards. Friel, on the other hand, has started 10 games for UNLV over the past two seasons. Both quarterbacks will need to step up as the Rebels aim to maintain their strong start and make a push for the Mountain West title. A Defining Moment for NIL As NIL continues to reshape the landscape of college sports, incidents like this one with Sluka at UNLV may become more common unless reforms are put in place. Without clear guidelines, universities and athletes alike face uncertainty when it comes to fulfilling NIL agreements. The hope is that these high-profile cases will serve as a turning point, prompting changes that will create more stability in the NIL marketplace.  In the meantime, the Rebels will continue their season without Sluka, relying on their depth at quarterback to navigate the challenges ahead. With a key matchup against Fresno State looming, UNLV will have to adapt quickly to keep their undefeated season alive.

As conference realignments continue to shake up college sports, UNLV is now reconsidering its commitment to the Mountain West following Utah State’s decision to join the Pac-12. Initially, UNLV had agreed to remain with the Mountain West, but the exit of Utah State has led the Rebels to explore other options, leaving the Mountain West in a state of flux and adding further complexity to the ongoing college sports reshuffling. UNLV’s Dilemma UNLV’s decision to reconsider comes after Utah State announced its departure to the Pac-12, putting the Mountain West’s stability into question. Originally, UNLV had agreed to a memorandum of understanding to stay with the Mountain West, contingent on all remaining schools committing to the league. However, with Utah State leaving, the conference is left with just six football-playing members, well below the NCAA’s requirement of eight schools to maintain its FBS status. The loss of such a critical member only deepens the uncertainty surrounding the Mountain West’s future. The Mountain West had offered significant financial incentives to both UNLV and Air Force to keep them in the conference. These incentives included substantial payouts from media rights revenue, which the league had secured from exit fees of departing schools. Despite this offer, UNLV’s decision to pause and explore its options leaves the Mountain West in a precarious position, as it scrambles to secure commitments from other schools to meet the NCAA’s requirements. For UNLV, the chance to join a revived Pac-12 could present a more lucrative opportunity, though it comes with its own set of risks. The Pac-12’s Revival and Ongoing Expansion The Pac-12’s expansion efforts have been a lifeline for the storied conference, which was once one of college sports' most prestigious leagues. Following the exodus of several key members, including USC and UCLA, the Pac-12 has been working to rebuild itself with new members. Utah State’s decision to join is part of a larger effort to secure at least eight members by 2026 to maintain its status as an FBS conference. The Pac-12 still needs to bring in more schools to meet that threshold, and securing schools like UNLV could play a key role in its recovery. UNLV is now reconsidering its options, and talks between the school and the Pac-12 have reignited. However, the Pac-12’s future revenue projections remain unclear, as the conference has yet to secure a media deal following its reformation. While the potential for new revenue streams exists, the lack of a concrete media deal may make some schools hesitant to join. Yet, with the allure of returning to a Power Five conference, UNLV may be willing to take the risk if the Pac-12 can offer long-term stability. Mountain West Faces Uncertainty With the loss of Utah State and UNLV reconsidering its position, the Mountain West is left with only six football-playing members for the 2026 season. The conference is now in a race to secure at least two additional schools to maintain its FBS status by 2028. Financially, the Mountain West had been relying on revenue from media rights and exit fees from departing schools to remain competitive, but its future remains uncertain as schools like UNLV weigh their options. The conference’s diminished standing could lead to further exits if it cannot solidify its base. UNLV originally committed to return to its conference but now has second thoughts with the departure of Utah State. The mass departures from the Mountain West is just the beginning of a domino effect of schools searching for better media deals or where they feel the grass is greener. Hats off to the Pac-12 commissioner for pushing the envelope in trying to revive the storied conference, even if it appears they will not be classified as a Power conference as they once held the keys to for decades. We are still sitting back, waiting to see if any of the ACC schools like FSU or Clemson will continue testing the waters or stay put.  With the prospect of better financial deals on the horizon, more schools may explore leaving their current conferences, creating further upheaval across the college sports landscape. The shifting balance of power between conferences is likely to continue, as schools seek out the best opportunities for exposure and revenue. In the ever-changing landscape of college sports, these moves signal a pivotal moment for many conferences, and the outcome of these decisions will shape the future of college athletics for years to come. All eyes will be on the next moves from key players like the Pac-12 and Mountain West as the realignment saga unfolds.

The increasing trend of unauthorized lacrosse practices, known as "captain’s practices," has raised significant concerns across college athletic programs. These unsanctioned sessions, often led by team captains or senior players without official oversight, have resulted in serious injuries and placed universities at risk of potential lawsuits. As more of these incidents come to light, athletic conferences across the country must take proactive steps to implement policies and procedures that safeguard student-athletes and reduce the legal liabilities of schools. The Tufts Incident: A Wake-Up Call One recent example that has sparked discussions around athlete safety occurred at Tufts University, where 12 men’s lacrosse players were diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis, a rare and potentially life-threatening condition. The condition resulted from an intense, voluntary, supervised 45-minute workout led by a former Navy SEAL graduate. Of the 12 affected athletes, five were hospitalized due to the severity of their injuries. Rhabdomyolysis occurs when muscle tissue breaks down after extreme physical exertion, leading to muscle fibers being released into the bloodstream, which can cause kidney damage or even failure. This incident underscores the dangers associated with unregulated workouts and the need for strict guidelines around training protocols. Although this particular workout was supervised, the case has reignited concerns about unauthorized or unsupervised practices across college sports. The Dangers of "Captain’s Practices" Captain’s practices are unofficial team workouts led by athletes without the direct involvement of coaches or athletic staff. In lacrosse, these practices have become common as players seek extra conditioning outside of sanctioned training sessions. While these practices are often well-intentioned, aiming to improve performance or foster team camaraderie, they present considerable risks when conducted without proper medical supervision or adherence to safety guidelines. Over the years, several student-athletes have suffered serious injuries during captain’s practices, including torn ligaments, fractures, and muscle strains. These injuries can sideline athletes for weeks or months, jeopardizing their collegiate careers. Furthermore, if these injuries occur during unsanctioned events, universities can find themselves exposed to legal claims from injured players, particularly if there is no clear policy governing such practices. Legal Implications for Universities Universities face significant legal exposure when injuries occur during unauthorized training sessions. In the Tufts case, the university promptly took steps to address the situation, suspending team practices and appointing an external investigator to review the circumstances that led to the incident. Tufts also emphasized the need to evaluate the conditions under which the injuries took place and expressed a commitment to ensuring the safety of its athletes moving forward. However, the broader issue remains: without formal policies in place to regulate captain’s practices, universities may be held liable for injuries sustained during these sessions. Courts could determine that institutions failed to protect their athletes if there is no clear communication or enforcement of safety protocols regarding voluntary workouts. As the number of captain’s practices grows, so too does the likelihood of litigation. The Need for Comprehensive Policies and Procedures Athletic conferences and universities must take immediate steps to put in place comprehensive policies that either restrict or closely monitor captain’s practices. By establishing clear protocols, schools can mitigate the risks associated with these unsanctioned events and protect both the well-being of their athletes and their own legal interests. Key policy recommendations include: Requiring Medical Supervision: Schools should require that certified medical personnel be present during any practice or workout, whether official or voluntary. Setting Clear Boundaries: Policies should clearly outline the differences between authorized and unauthorized practices, ensuring athletes are aware of the risks involved in participating in unsanctioned workouts. Mandating Recovery Periods: Implementing mandatory rest and recovery periods can help prevent overexertion, which is a key factor in conditions like rhabdomyolysis. Accountability Measures: Coaches, athletic directors, and team captains should be held accountable for enforcing these policies, with consequences for failing to follow established protocols. By adopting these measures, athletic programs can foster a safer environment for athletes while minimizing potential legal exposure. Schools must balance the desire for competitive performance with the need to protect their athletes’ health. Addressing a Nationwide Issue While the Tufts incident brought national attention to the risks of unregulated practices, it is not an isolated case. Across the country, athletes in various sports are engaging in similar unsanctioned practices, leaving universities vulnerable to future legal challenges. The culture of these workouts, which are often seen as necessary to remain competitive, needs to be reevaluated to prioritize the long-term health of student-athletes. Athletic conferences, from the NCAA to smaller regional leagues, have a responsibility to take the lead in creating and enforcing rules that protect student-athletes. By implementing nationwide policies that apply to all sports, particularly high-risk ones like lacrosse, universities can establish a framework that reduces injuries and ensures that athletes are training under safe, supervised conditions. In the rapidly evolving landscape of college athletics, it is imperative that schools prioritize the safety and well-being of their student-athletes, especially as the demands of sports continue to grow.

In a significant development for college sports, Utah State has officially agreed to join the Pac-12, a crucial step in the conference’s ongoing efforts to rebuild. With this addition, the Pac-12 moves closer to securing its status as a recognized FBS football conference, needing just one more member to meet the NCAA’s minimum requirement of eight full-time members. Utah State's Move Strengthens Pac-12's Rebuild The Pac-12, once a dominant force in college athletics, has been scrambling to stabilize its membership following the mass exodus of teams in recent realignment cycles. With only Oregon State and Washington State remaining from its previous lineup, the conference has aggressively pursued new members. The addition of Utah State marks the continuation of a rebuilding effort that began with the inclusion of Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, and San Diego State from the Mountain West, all set to join in 2026. The Pac-12’s goal is clear: to re-establish itself as a competitive conference in the rapidly evolving college sports landscape, particularly in football. By securing Utah State, the Pac-12 brings its member total to seven, just shy of the required eight schools needed to retain its FBS status, which allows its champion to qualify for the 12-team College Football Playoff. UNLV’s Uncertainty Amid the Shuffle While Utah State’s decision offers the Pac-12 some stability, UNLV’s situation remains fluid. Initially committed to staying in the Mountain West, UNLV has now paused to re-evaluate its options. This uncertainty comes after Utah State’s departure left the Mountain West with just seven football-playing members, jeopardizing its standing as an FBS conference. UNLV had previously agreed to a memorandum of understanding with the Mountain West, which included financial incentives to remain a linchpin in the conference alongside Air Force. However, with Utah State exiting, the dynamics have shifted. UNLV must now consider whether to remain with the Mountain West, where its media distribution revenue is secure, or to explore a future in the Pac-12, where long-term financial prospects remain uncertain due to the conference’s ongoing restructuring. Mountain West Faces Uncertainty The Mountain West now finds itself in a precarious position. With the departure of Utah State and the potential exit of UNLV, the conference risks falling below the NCAA’s required eight members to be considered an FBS league. Should UNLV leave, the Mountain West will need to find at least two additional football-playing schools by 2028 to maintain its status. The Mountain West’s strategy had centered on retaining its current members while using exit fees from departing schools to bolster its financial standing. However, as Pac-12 expansion efforts continue, the Mountain West’s ability to hold its members is being tested. Pac-12's Path Forward For the Pac-12, the next steps involve securing an eighth member to complete its reformation. Reports suggest that UNLV remains a top target, and the conference has also held discussions with other schools, including basketball powers Gonzaga and UConn. However, the clock is ticking, and both the Pac-12 and the Mountain West are racing to solidify their respective futures. What is Next? As college sports continue to experience a wave of realignment, the decisions of schools like Utah State and UNLV will play pivotal roles in shaping the landscape of the Pac-12 and the Mountain West. With Utah State now committed, the Pac-12 moves closer to securing its future, while UNLV and the Mountain West face critical choices that could redefine their paths in the coming years.

The ACC has solidified its presence in collegiate volleyball, with six of its teams ranked in this week’s AVCA Top 25 poll. Pittsburgh made history, taking the No. 1 spot for the first time in program history, while Stanford remains strong at No. 2. The rise of ACC volleyball is evident, with several schools showcasing their dominance early in the season. Pittsburgh Takes the Top Spot Pittsburgh’s No. 1 ranking marks a significant milestone for the program and the ACC. The Panthers have started the season with a perfect 6-0 record and earned 33 first-place votes. This is only the second time in ACC history that a team has achieved the top ranking, with Louisville reaching this honor in 2021. Pitt’s consistent performances, including key victories over ranked opponents, have set them apart as one of the nation's top teams. Stanford Holds Strong at No. 2 Stanford, another ACC newcomer, continues to impress, holding steady at No. 2 in the rankings. With a 7-0 record, the Cardinal have shown their depth and resilience, further enhancing the ACC's reputation on the national stage. SMU Makes History For the first time in school history, SMU volleyball has earned a spot in the AVCA Top 25, coming in at No. 22. The Mustangs’ 6-3 start to their inaugural ACC season has been marked by major wins, including a historic sweep over then-No. 2 Nebraska and a victory over No. 18 Baylor. SMU’s success is a testament to the growth of the program, and their debut in the Top 25 signals that they are a team to watch. Other ACC Teams in the Top 25 Alongside Pittsburgh, Stanford, and SMU, Louisville, Georgia Tech, and Florida State round out the ACC’s representation in the Top 25. Louisville holds the No. 4 spot, continuing its dominant run after reaching the national championship in 2021. Georgia Tech sits at No. 13 with a strong 7-1 record, while Florida State moved up to No. 18 after impressive performances this season. Looking Ahead As the season progresses, the ACC is poised to continue its dominance in the national volleyball landscape. Pittsburgh, Stanford, SMU, and the rest of the ACC teams will face tough competition as they aim to maintain their rankings and push for national success. With six teams in the AVCA Top 25, the ACC has become a powerhouse in collegiate volleyball. East Coast Sports Live will continue to provide coverage of these exciting developments, with photos and videos from key matches to be posted throughout the season.